Re: Annoying problem with subprocesses

["John E. Davis" <davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

sdupont@xxxxxxx <sdupont@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>So I checked get_process_status() again and there seems to be a bug
>in the adjustment since Subprocess_Read_fds[i][0] (the actual fd)
>is checked and not Subprocess_Read_fds[i][1] (the jed rep.) as it should(?):

I believe you are correct, except I do not think that your patch is
entirely correct:

>static void get_process_status (Process_Type *p) /*{{{*/
>{
>   [...]
>   /* Adjust the array of read descriptors */
>
>   i = 0;
>   
>   while (i < Num_Subprocesses)
>     { 
>	/* if (Subprocess_Read_fds[i][0] == slfd) WRONG? */
>        if (Subprocess_Read_fds[i][1] == slfd)
>	  break;
>	  

  The above appears to be the correct patch, but I do not believe the
  changes below are necessary:

>	i++;
>     }
>   /*fd = Subprocess_Read_fds [i][0]; WRONG? */
>   fd = Subprocess_Read_fds [i][1];
>
>   [...]
>
>   if (Max_Subprocess_FD == fd)
>     {
>	i = 0;
>	fd = -1;
>	while (i < Num_Subprocesses)
>	  {
>	     /*if (Subprocess_Read_fds[i][0] > fd) 
>	       fd = Subprocess_Read_fds[i][0]; WRONG? */
>             if (Subprocess_Read_fds[i][1] > fd) 
>	       fd = Subprocess_Read_fds[i][1];
>	     i++;
>	  }
>	Max_Subprocess_FD = fd;
>     }
>Doing this little change, subprocesses work as expected (=GREAT!)

If you leave out the changes in the above bit of quoted text, do the
subprocesses still work?

Thanks,
--John

--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>.